কোড নিয়ম ভাঙলে
সংখ্যা কথা বলছে
কাগজপত্রে,এটি ছিল একটি সহজলগ্ন: Coinme, Seattle-ভিত্তিক crypto ATM-এর, California-এর \(1,000-এর दৈনিক लिमिट को पार करा। एকবারই? नা—बारंबार। State \)300,000-এর जरिमाना देखले एবং $51,700-এর पुनर्स्थापना की संख्या an Elderly fraud victim - er jyotirnagar.
ওই last part? Wallet - er than the fine.
Why This Hurts More Than Just the Wallet
আমি algorithm build korechi jeta microseconds e volatility predict korechhi. Kintu ekta thing model e nai: human vulnerability. Jokhon ekshon older or less tech-savvy ATM-e khete jaytai digital wealth promise kore—tahar ekta high-risk trade cycle e locked hoye jayta jodi kono limit check na kora hoy—system technically fail hoi na… but morally.
Crypto ATMs machine naki gateways? Unregulated space e identity fade hoye risk spike hoye jaay. Jokhon platforms like Coinme basic safeguards enforce na—tahar accomplices hoye jaay—not innovators.
Compliance Isn’t Bureaucracy; It’s Ethics
I believe in decentralization. I wrote my thesis on blockchain as social infrastructure—not financial speculation.
But freedom without guardrails is noise. California didn’t invent this rule for fun; they did it because people get hurt when unbounded access meets impulse. The law demands transparency too: receipts must disclose limits and risks. Yet Coinme missed that detail—another silent failure in an ecosystem obsessed with speed over clarity. It’s not about slowing down innovation—it’s about making sure we don’t leave behind those who need protection most.
So What Now?
This isn’t just about one company paying a fine. It’s a signal: The future of Web3 won’t be built by code alone—but by code with conscience. If you’re launching a dApp or running kiosks across towns—ask yourself:
- Who does this serve?
- Who might get left behind?
- Are we building tools—or traps? We’re not here to replace banks… but to rebuild trust between people and technology. And honestly? That starts with checking your own rules before anyone else does. P.S.: If you’ve ever used a crypto ATM and felt unsure whether it was safe—or if you’ve been curious about how these systems protect real users—I’m starting a private thread called ‘Soul Coding.’ Join if you want deeper dives into ethics, design, and human-centered tech—one thoughtful post at a time.
LunaQuantumEdge
জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (3)
코드가 법을 깼다?
코인미, $30만 달러 벌금+노인 피해자 배상… 정말 말도 안 되는 일이 벌어졌네.
왜 이건 단순한 벌금이 아닐까?
내가 쓴 알고리즘이 초당 밀리초 단위로 변동성 예측했지만, 사람의 약점을 예측한 적은 없었어. 결국 시스템은 기술적으로는 잘 돌아갔지만, 마음의 보호장치는 다 빠져나갔다.
규제 = 도덕적인 책임?
디센트럴라이제이션은 좋아. 하지만 무제한 자유는 ‘소음’뿐. 지난번에 한국에서도 NFT 소유권 판결 나왔잖아. ‘코드만 있으면 권리다’? 그게 진짜일까?
그래서 이제 뭐 할까?
이걸 그냥 회사 실수로 넘길 수 있을까? 아니! 이건 우리가 만드는 미래에 대한 경고야. ‘누구를 위한 기술인가?’ 질문부터 다시 해보자.
P.S.: 혹시 코인 ATM 써본 사람? 진짜 안전했니? 댓글에서 토론 시작해볼까? 🤔 #코드와윤리 #코인미사례 #디지털소유권
ตอนเห็นข่าวว่า Coinme เกินขีดจำกัด \(1,000 ก็คิดว่าเป็นแค่เรื่องเงิน ๆ ทอง ๆ... แต่พอรู้ว่าต้องจ่ายคืนผู้สูงอายุคนหนึ่ง \)51,700 เลยรู้สึกเหมือนโดนโกงทั้งระบบ!
นี่ไม่ใช่แค่ผิดกฎหมาย — มันผิดศีลธรรม! ถ้า ATM เก็บเงินเราได้เร็วขนาดนี้ จะช่วยคนแก่ให้ซื้อหุ้น NFT ได้มั้ย?
ใครเคยใช้ ATM เหรียญดิจิทัลบ้าง? มาแชร์ประสบการณ์กันหน่อยนะ — เครื่องไหนปลอดภัยที่สุดในกรุงเทพฯ?
#Coinme #CryptoCompliance #EthicalTech
