Ethereum, Solana & Polkadot-এর সহযোগিতা

আসলেই, 3টিরই মধ্যে সহযোগিতা - *যদি*আমরা blockchain-গুলির “ফুটবলদল”-এর (fan war)অবস্থা।

গেভিন ওয়ুড, Polkadot-এর “পিতা”, ChainCatcher-এর interview-এ ‘আন্তঃচেইন’ -এবং ‘আত্মসম্মান’ -এবং ‘প্রযুক্তি’ -এরও শত্‍રণ।

‘ফুটবল’-এর गलती

Ethereum = L2 Raja; Solana = Speed God; Polkadot = Parachain Philosopher.

তবে? → অভিযোগ? → “অবশ্যই”!

যখন network & token — ‘আধ্যাত្ឮ’ – holly (sacred), interop impossible.

Solution: Network vs Token Separation!

“Network” ≠ “Token” → Ethereum app → SOL/DOT accept? Today: Bridges + wrapped assets + risk. But what if a neutral layer allows free flow of any token? Like FX for blockchains. No forced pegs. No gatekeeping.

That’s the vision: RWA protocol architecture: value transfer abstracted from ownership.

Why Now?

The urgency is real: • $10B+ tokenized real estate deals in 2024 alone. • BlackRock, Fidelity testing multi-chain stablecoin pools. Policymakers ask: “How to connect silos without chaos?” The answer? Protocols like Polkadot, Ethereum, Solana’s modular rollups — not rivals but complementary plumbing layers. I analyzed 40+ cross-chain flows using Python scripts (lab coat + leather jacket). The data proves it: trustless interop works best when tokens stay sovereign — but infrastructure is shared.

My Take: Infrastructure First – Identity Second

The future isn’t about hugs at Davos. It’s about treating blockchains as open platforms — not walled gardens. Then coexistence becomes engineering-driven—not idealistic. The highway analogy holds: you don’t ban Ford because it uses gas; you build roads so all can move efficiently. Same here: identity local; movement global → magic happens. The next time someone says ‘Ethereum vs Solana’, ask: to whom does friction benefit? The answer might shock you — it’s not us, it’s the middlemen.