सिटीग्राम में कॉर्पोरेट धोखाधड़ी
पहचाने गए संकेतों के प्रति मुँहदेखत समझदार
मुझे पहली स्मार्ट कॉन्ट्रैक्ट 12:30 AM Brooklyn में ₹6000+5498978475765765765765498479824892348923489234111111111
इसका मतलब: प्रभावशाली प्रणालियों में टिप (अपवाद) हमशमश, हमशमश!
Michael Zidell $20M ₹6000+549897847576576576576549847982489234892348923411111
‘पिग-बटचरिंग’ - Trust & Silence
फ़ेसबुक पर ‘NFT’-सच्चई-धनवर्षण-अभियुदय-उपयुक्त-आधुनिक- इस “Carolyn Parker” -ठग -था, NFT-उपयुक्त-आधुनिक-
citigroup-mere-lakho-kya-hua?
Banks are still behind the curve!
DeFi – underrepresented founders – trust building. But banks? Still on outdated systems. Blockchain activity = wire transfer? No real understanding of digital red flags like rapid cross-chain movement. This isn’t negligence—it’s institutional blindness.
Psychological cost is real.
Losing life savings when you trusted your bank? That breaks faith in safety itself. I’ve seen women devs leave tech after being told they’re ‘too emotional’. The lawsuit isn’t just legal—it’s emotional restitution for everyone who felt invisible. And yes—I still check my transaction history at 2 a.m., wondering if this time someone will notice before it’s too late.
What we can do now—Beyond blame:
Better oversight: real-time monitoring tools across banking and blockchain networks. Imagine AML systems trained on chain data streams—not static forms filled by exhausted officers. Crypto regulation must evolve—not behind walls, but alongside innovation. We—the builders, users, and dreamers—must demand transparency from institutions that claim to protect us. you’re not paranoid if you question whether your bank sees what you see.
NeonVox_95
लोकप्रिय टिप्पणी (4)
เห็นไหมว่าธนาคารใหญ่ๆ เขาไม่ได้ดูแลเงินเราขนาดนั้นหรอก! แค่เห็นการโอนเงินเป็นก้อนใหญ่ๆ ผ่านบัญชีลับ ก็ควรรีบหยุดแล้วใช่มั้ย? แต่ที่ Citigroup กลับเหมือนตาบอดจิตใจ — เงินหายไป $20M ก็ยังไม่รู้ตัว! 😱
อย่างนี้เรียกว่า ‘ปลอดภัย’ เหรอ? ผมเคยวิเคราะห์ตลาดคริปโตที่วัดเจ้าแม่ในกรุงเทพฯ มาแล้วนะ…แต่วันนี้ต้องขอเตือน: อย่าเชื่อธนาคารมากเกินไป!
ถ้าคุณเคยส่งเงินแล้วมานั่งกังวลตอนดึก…คอมเมนต์มาเลย! เราไม่ได้โดดเดี่ยว 🙏💸
Why Banks Are Still Blind to Crypto Scams
Citigroup’s $20M meltdown? Not a coding error—just bad judgment on a napkin.
43 red flags? One billion dollars funneled into Guju Inc.? They didn’t blink.
Meanwhile, I built DeFi protocols while my sleep schedule looked like a crypto chart—still more alert than Citigroup’s compliance team.
You’re not paranoid if your bank doesn’t see what you see. You’re just… not their customer.
Spoiler: The real protocol was never on-chain—it was trust. And it failed.
So next time you send money to a shell company named ‘Guju,’ ask yourself: who’s really watching?
You know what? Let’s debate this in the comments—your turn to roast the bank that slept through the crypto crash.
So Citigroup had AI that could see the warning signs… but chose to nap instead? 🤡 Their AML system was running on ‘zombie mode’ — no alerts, just silence and $20M worth of ‘funneled’ transfers to Guju Inc. Meanwhile, I coded my first DeFi contract at 3 a.m. while sipping cold brew wondering if this was fraud… or just another Tuesday morning dream.
You’re not paranoid if you question it — you’re just awake.
P.S. Who else’s bank still thinks NFTs are just wire transfers? Drop a comment below before I code the next bailout.
O Citigroup não perdeu 20 milhões por burrice — perdeu porque dormiu como um gato na frente do terminal à 2h! Enquanto os desenvolvedores de DeFi faziam smart contracts com café e coragem, eles transferiam dinheiro para uma empresa fantasma chamada Guju Inc. O sistema anti-lavagem? Não existia — só tinha um GIF de um porco sendo esfolhado com ETH na parede da caixa. Quem vai pagar isso? 🤔 Comenta lá embaixo: tu também dormirias assim?
